post service survey
Feedback Survey
The best time to measure a service experience is immediately after it ends, not 24 hours later in a scheduled email. Deploy this automation and a short survey fires the moment an appointment is marked complete, reaching the customer while the details are still specific.
About this automation
Type
Feedback Survey
Industry
Free to use
✓ Yes
Deploy time
Under 5 min
Triggers
API
Delivers via
Email, SMS
What this survey asks
01
How would you rate today's service?
Rating, 1 to 5 stars, fires at appointment completion
02
Did the technician explain the work clearly?
Yes / No
03
How would you rate time on site?
Rating, 1 to 5 stars
04
How likely are you to rebook?
0 to 10 scale
05
Anything we should know?
Open text, routes to operations if flagged
The automation
Trigger: an appointment is marked complete
Fires the moment the appointment is marked complete.
API
Survey delivered within the hour
Goes out via Email or SMS, while the visit is still specific.
Routed by technician performance
A low score tied to a specific technician reaches their supervisor same-day.
Positive sentiment
Routes to a review request at peak satisfaction.
Needs attention
Low scores route to the operations manager same-day.
Service performance dashboard
Scores by technician and service type, updated in real time.
Why this automation matters
Service businesses lose feedback quality in the time between a completed appointment and a delayed survey delivery. A customer who had a great interaction with a specific staff member can describe it precisely in the hour after the appointment. The same customer, surveyed 24 hours later, gives you a general positive rating. The customer surveyed three days later gives you a lower response rate and less useful data. Timing and specificity are directly linked. Deploy FeedbackRobot's post-service survey automation and the trigger is the appointment completion event, not a calendar. When a booking system marks an appointment as completed, the survey fires immediately. The questions are specific to the service type: technician quality, time on site, explanation of work done, likelihood to rebook. Each response is classified on arrival. A low score on technician quality routes to the operations manager. A comment about a specific staff member routes to their supervisor. A strong positive experience routes to a review request. The aggregate data across all service appointments gives your operations team a continuous quality signal rather than a periodic report. A technician whose post-service scores trend lower than the team average is visible in the data weeks before a complaint is formally raised. A service type that consistently generates positive feedback is evidence for what you are doing right in that area.
Expected outcome
Connects to the platforms that matter
Triggers
API
Channels
Email, SMS
Common questions
Why trigger from appointment completion rather than a fixed delay?
A customer's memory of a service visit is most accurate in the first two hours, a fixed 24-hour delay already measures a softened, more general impression.
What happens to a low technician-quality score?
It routes to the operations manager, and if a specific staff member is mentioned, that comment routes to their supervisor directly.
Can this identify a technician trending below the team average?
Yes, the aggregate data surfaces that pattern weeks before a formal complaint would typically be raised.
Does a strong positive response do anything beyond logging the score?
Yes, it can route to a review request at the same moment, while satisfaction is at its peak.