lawyer review management
Review Management
Most law firm marketing teams check one review platform and ignore the others. A negative review on Avvo or an unanswered question on FindLaw can be the first thing a prospective client finds. Deploy this automation and every platform feeds into one daily queue so nothing goes unanswered.
About this automation
Type
Review Management
Industry
Free to use
✓ Yes
Deploy time
Under 5 min
Triggers
New Review
Delivers via
Dashboard, Email
What your dashboard shows
Platforms monitored
Google, Avvo, Martindale-Hubbell, and FindLaw aggregated into one feed
Below-four-star alert
Any review under four stars triggers a same-day notification
Response drafted for approval
Prepared automatically using approved language, reviewed before publishing
Rating by practice area
Compare which practice areas have the strongest and weakest review profiles
Attorney-level comparison
For multi-attorney firms, see review volume and rating by individual attorney
The automation
New review posts on Google, Avvo, Martindale-Hubbell, or FindLaw
Fires the instant a new review posts across Google, Avvo, Martindale-Hubbell, or FindLaw.
New Review
Same-day alert on low ratings
Any review below four stars triggers an immediate notification.
Rating-based priority
A review under four stars jumps the queue for same-day attention.
Positive sentiment
Positive reviews queue for acknowledgment.
Needs attention
Reviews below four stars trigger a same-day alert.
Dashboard: per-practice-area comparison
Rating and review volume compared across every practice area and attorney.
Why this automation matters
Lawyer review management across multiple platforms creates a monitoring problem that most firms handle by not handling it. Google gets checked occasionally. Avvo might have a profile that was claimed once and never revisited. Martindale-Hubbell has a peer rating but no client reviews because no one has set up the collection process. FindLaw and Justia have pages that rank well for specific practice area searches but have not been updated in two years. Each of these gaps represents a prospective client who arrived at a profile and found nothing convincing. Deploy FeedbackRobot's lawyer review management automation and all platforms are pulled into a single daily feed. New reviews arrive classified by platform and rating. A review on any platform that is below four stars triggers an alert the same day. A positive review on Avvo or Martindale gets acknowledged with a response that is visible to every future client who reads that profile as part of their evaluation. For firms with multiple attorneys and multiple practice areas, the review data by attorney and by practice area creates a comparison baseline that business development partners can use to identify where the firm's reputation is strongest and where it needs investment. A practice area with strong work but a thin review profile is a specific development opportunity, not a general marketing problem.
Expected outcome
Connects to the platforms that matter
Triggers
New Review
Channels
Dashboard, Email
Common questions
Why four stars as the alert threshold instead of three?
For legal specifically, a prospective client evaluating a high-stakes decision treats anything under four stars as a real concern, not just an average score, so the threshold is set tighter than in lower-stakes categories.
Does Martindale-Hubbell's peer rating get included, or only client reviews?
This monitors client reviews specifically, Martindale's peer rating is a separate credential, not a review, and isn't part of this feed.
Can this identify which practice area needs the most reputation investment?
Yes, that's one of its main comparative uses, a practice area with strong casework but a thin review profile shows up clearly as a specific gap, not a vague marketing problem.
Does a positive review get any response, or only negative ones?
Positive reviews also get a drafted acknowledgment queued for approval, visible to every future client reading that profile, not just damage control on negative ones.